ORIGEN DEL SOCIALISMO DEL SIGLO XXI. Heinz Dieterich Steffan. es un sociólogo y analista político alemán, residente en México. HEINZ DIETERICH STEFFAN SOCIALISMO DEL SIGLO XXI BASES DEL MODELO El desarrollismo democrático regional. La economía de. 20 Chávez apparently borrowed this term from German sociologist Heinz Dieterich Steffan (see Hugo Chávez; El socialismo del siglo XXI), although the term.
|Published (Last):||27 December 2007|
|PDF File Size:||20.93 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.38 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
For example, in just 6 months, at the beginning of his mandate, Nestor Kirchner enacted supreme decrees, a rate correspon-ding to 38 decrees per month. Beyond the infrastructure and public investment -that any government with economic resources could also perform- the administration of Correa is characterized this year -as in the previous but now more intensily- eel the persecution of anyone who raises an opinion contrary to its management.
Las complejidades de la izquierda radical latinoamericana en el poder: Disregard of the rights of minorities The Commission on Human Rights of the Organization of American States is investigating cases of political discrimination in Venezuela.
The clearest example can be found in the Venezuelan version of XXI century socialism which presents a strong blend of historic Bolivarian nationalism, Marxism of the twentieth century and Latin American populism.
Freedom of the press The Venezuelan journalist Carlos Ball president of the Center for the dissemination of the Knowledge Economy for Freedom Cedice Freedom considers that in a democratic society the existence of private media, apart from political and economic power is essential.
Sobre el socialismo del siglo XXI en Venezuela. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia13 42 For Ball, this issue had serious repercussions since it led to the imposition of an ideology which means a single thought and set a serious precedent that acts as a factor of intimidation to the whole private media information of Venezuela and leads to a state of rigid journal control of the social communication, with the consequences that derive from such action Ball,p According to Repoll during the governments of Nestor Kirchner and Cristina Fernandez an open confrontation with the multimedia group Clarin existed, due to the constant Government opposition to this medium of communication.
The information of the Federal Chamber does not specify how many of those complaints became formal judicial inquiries but prosecutors made the corresponding requirements.
El socialismo del siglo XXI – Heinz Dieterich Steffan – Google Books
Seffan Latinoamericanos16 31 In the past legislative elections, the resignation of many opposition candidates was presented on the grounds due to a lack of strffan from the National Electoral Commission CNE charged in previous elections with electoral fraud in favor of Hugo Chavez. Cuadernos del Cendes25 68 On his side, the government of Evo Morales has several trends: Economic development The political process initiated in Ecuador in deserves special attention due to the combination of multiple elements, sometimes of truly revolutionary nature, other hint of regressive, but always risky and contradictory.
And the third, because unlike the governments of Venezuela and Bolivia, which can be considered as populist because beyond their limitations, pointed to the redistribution of social power and the empowerment of the subordinate sectors. The search stsffan the supreme Social happiness from the construction of an inclusive society; The construction of a revolutionary and leading democracy, understood as the one that transforms the weakness of the individual in collective force.
The letter K in Argentina has been used by the media to identify the regime of the married couple Kirchner. Bajo el Volcan11 17 The construction of a revolutionary and leading democracy, understood as the one that xx the weakness of the individual in collective force. On the other hand, Ecuador under the strongman regime of Rafael Correa has achieved robust economic performance but has worn in a constant dispute with the media opponents.
This regime was characterized by a populism oriented to polarize politically the country by the concentration of public power in the hands of the presidential couple, by the constant attacks on the media opponents in the newspaper El Clarin especially because of the corruption in the highest spheres of government.
Dieterich, Heinz 1943-
When the main mass media is at the service of the dominant political project and is related to a single guideline, plurality disappears as well as the possibilities of exercising critique, these are key components of all order based on respect for public and individual freedoms, the balance between society and the State and the cooperation between the Powers Ball, In this article, Monedero summarizes the important differences between steffzn two types of socialism taking as sigo some analysis factors such as: The individual self-government is linked to the social self-determination.
The clearest example of this can be found in the Venezuelan version of socialism of the XXI century where there is a strong mixture of Bolivarian historical nationalism, Marxism of the XX century and Latin American populism.
Totalitarismo del Siglo XXI. Conceptual differences between socialism and socialism of the XXI century. As this is a trend politically unclear, that is defined more by its method that soccialismo its objectives, has not allowed the government to consolidate a definite course. During his government, there has been a great public investment for infrastructure, roads, security and social development. However, this does not mean socializmo the popular classes are absent, without forgetting their trade union traditions, opening new fronts of conflict and struggle, the subaltern classes may increasingly become the guests of stone Svampa, Socialism of the XXI century The initial part of this article aims to clarify the xi of socialism of the XXI century, its theoretical interpretation and its differentiation with the socialism developed in Eastern Europe in the second half of the twentieth century.
Must have open mechanisms of collective deliberation and decision, so that solving the problems is a matter of public opinion, it is more difficult for people to pursue their individual steffqn.
The socialist governments in Latin America have recently suffered the most uproarious defeats, since Chavez in to strengthen the emergence of the twenty-first century socialism. It actually had a break point in the year According to Garcia with the circumstances in the country, the Bolivian society genuinely do not live under the rule of law, with full independence of powers and the ability of the institutions to be placed under the law to all persons, regardless of their jobs, political affiliation or economic power.
In the midst of growing difficulties, the government of Evo Morales led a process of change characterized by the political strength of his party and the lack of definition of its draft state reform, which is a mixture of nationalism and Indigenism.
This initiative was endorsed by the National Congress on 10 October with the enactment of Law No. Policies implemented by the previous governments were abolished with a style of confrontation that sought to remove from the Venezuelan political spectrum the bipartisanship and any other political expression.
Monedero,p. Media in Ecuador live a constant confrontation with the government of Rafael Correa, which has led especially to large employers of the communication to form a complex opposition group. Must provide the foundations of health, education, freedom and justice that allow citizenships to share responsibility for their decisions.
This political regime turned around the central and emblematic figure of Hugo Chavez and public policies depended on the particular juncture by which crossed the country at a given time. In each of these countries, in each one of the crisis faced by those Governments, the leading role has been of the private media, acting so brutal and overwhelmingly against the governments which have benefited from its successes and with broad government popular support. In Bolivia under the command of a Evo Morales waving the flags of the authoritarianism and Indigenism.
In order to comply with the main purpose, the first part of the document provides an overview of some concepts developed by the theory of XXI century socialism and some factors that differentiate it from the socialism that was developed in Eastern Europe in the second half of the twentieth century.
The second, because the kirchnerism never intended to promote dynamics of democratization, in contrast to what it has happened with governments in Bolivia, Venezuela and Ecuador, which addressed constitutional processes of participatory character and led to extend the frontiers of rights Svampa, Do we have freedom?
Populism on the family Kirchner.