Carlo Ginzburg. The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth-Century Miller. Translated by John and Anne C. Tedeschi. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins. The Cheese and the Worms: the Cosmos of a 16th-Century Miller by Carlo Ginzburg, translated by John Tedeschi and Anne Tedeschi. The Cheese and the Worms has ratings and reviews. Jan-Maat Carlo Ginzburg uses the trial records of Domenico Scandella, a miller also known as.
|Published (Last):||26 July 2013|
|PDF File Size:||9.94 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.35 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Imponderabilia: The Cheese and the Worms: Social History with Interdisciplinary Methodology
A really fascinating book, and I’d guess that would still be true even if you’re not usually a big history reader. These ideas and convictions, or at least the soil in which they grow, come from the oral culture. But Anabaptists probably inherited this belief from the Hussites, who took it from English Lollards. The Cheese and the Worms: There is one consoling moment in this grim conclusion. JHU Press- History – pages. I’m still not sure about his conclusions in as much as they are predicated on the suitability of Menocchio, a single and rather eccentric man, as a means of investigating Friuli peasantry as a whole.
The Cheese and the Worms is a study of the popular culture in the sixteenth century as seen through the eyes of one man, a miller brought to trial during the Inquisition.
Quotes from The Cheese and th The fact that the mills where, by necessity, on the edges of town meant they could be used as a rendezvous location for anti-establishment types and that the profession of the miller was often disliked by the rest of the peasantry similar to how people today talk disparagingly of the used care salesman.
The subject matter — and the subject himself Domenico Scandella, a miller who was burned at the stake as a heretic in the 16th century is fascinating. He writes a letter to the judges to ask for his forgiveness.
Il formaggio e i vermi – Carlo Ginzburg – Google Books
Menocchio believes that mans relationship to man is more important than his relationship Blind Alley?: Only in the present generation have historians like Robert Mandrou and Peter Burke seriously attempted to ascertain what was going on beneath the surface. A short historical work attempts to look into the cosmos of a 16th-century miller in the north of Italy. In the sentences or snatches of sentences wrung out of books he found the instruments to formulate and defend his ideas.
Because of his nature, he was unable to cease speaking about his theological ideas with those who would listen. Menocchio was a literate peasant a rarity so it’s tempting to delineate his cosmogenic fancies to his booklearnin’.
The Cheese and the Worms
We should not let the long tradition of smearing practicing Catholics as the brainwashed servants of a threatening foreign power—in which sensationalist and hyperbolic depictions of the Roman Inquisition play a part—from identifying the Catholic Church of the late sixteenth century for what it was: Quindi abbandonate il grembiule e mettetevi comodi.
In his defense, the lack of pages comes not from a lack of research, but from a limited information pool — it seems that too many documents have been lost to time.
Every person considers his faith to be correct. Here we see his ideas on the growing perfection of God and the creation of man. The translators have, however, added a gratuitous note in which they tell us that Menocchio had a fair trial. His conclusions range from being considered Lutheran, Anabaptist, atheist, Muslim, pantheist, and pagan. The book examines the beliefs and world-view of Menocchio —also known as Domenico Scandella, who was an Italian miller from the village of Monterealetwenty-five kilometers north of Pordenone.
Ginzburg talks a bit about this in the preface, and has some interesting and reasoned insights — he never claims Menocchio’s story is representative, merely that it represents something we haven’t heard before. Some of the most interesting pages in this fascinating book grapple with the problem of identifying the ideas of this oral peasant culture.
Thanks to the second, words were at his disposal to express the obscure, inarticulate vision of ginburg world that fermented within him. The human scream cuts readily tue such objections. Cheese and the worms were an explanatory analogy for him. I’m undecided, but I’ll be thinking about this one for a while.
To ask other readers questions about The Cheese and the Wormsplease sign up. This was portrayed by Luther. Again, in Menocchio we have a unique case worm a literate peasant.
When Ginzberg found himself in this said predicament, his resolution was to grasp at straws and attempt to make broad claims for which his work did not lay the proper foundation to support. I’d might’ve tore through this one!
A medieval legend that greatly affected Menocchio.
Poi ho trovato il libro in offerta su Amazon.